# Lawwatch : Legal Resources for Advocates: A website for Simplifies Legal Resources for Laymen and Advocates

> Lawwatch: Legal Resource for Aspiring Advocates

Generated by Yoast SEO v28.0, this is an llms.txt file, meant for consumption by LLMs.

## Pages
- [About](https://lawwatch.in/about/)
- [Contact Us](https://lawwatch.in/contact-us/)

## Posts
- [Institutionalise Continuing Education of Advocates : Supreme Court](https://lawwatch.in/supreme-court-proposes-a-national-legal-academy-for-continuing-education-of-advocates/): In Ajay Vijh v\. Indian Banks Association \[2026 INSC 670\], the Supreme Court of India directed the Bar Council of India to institutionalise a culture of Continuing Legal Education \(CLE\), and suggested that the Bar Council consider establishing a National Legal Academy \(NLA\) for the continuing education of advocates\.
- [Proving the Signature of the Testator and Its Attestation Not Sufficient to Prove the Will When Suspicious Circumstances Exist](https://lawwatch.in/proving-the-signature-of-the-testator-and-its-attestation-not-sufficient-to-prove-the-will-when-suspicious-circumstances-exist/): Proof of a will is not just proving the signature of the testator on the Will and its attestation in terms of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act; rather it is an exercise to satisfy the Court's conscience that the testator had signed the Will with free will being aware of its contents and after understanding the nature and effect of the dispositions in the Will, observed the Supreme Court in Sardari Lal v\. Bishan Dass \& Ors \[2026 INSC 669\]\.
- [A Judgment Issued Based on AI Generated Fake Precedents Amounts to No Judgment](https://lawwatch.in/a-judgment-issued-based-on-ai-generated-fake-precedents-amounts-to-no-judgment/): In Pooja Ramesh Singh v\. Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd\. and Anr\. \[2026 INSC 668\], the Supreme Court of India held that any decision of a court or adjudicating authority based on fake, non\-existent, or hallucinated material—including AI\-generated precedents—amounts to no decision at all in the eyes of law\.
- [Probate Jurisdiction in Kerala: Scope, Limitations and Judicial Principles](https://lawwatch.in/probate-jurisdiction-in-kerala-scope-limitations-and-judicial-principles/): Probate proceedings are concerned exclusively with the authenticity, legality, and due execution of a Will\. Questions relating to title, possession, partition, or rival proprietary claims ordinarily fall outside the jurisdiction of the probate court\.
- [Prior Sanction Not Needed in Cases Relating to Misappropriation of Funds](https://lawwatch.in/prior-sanction-not-needed-in-cases-relating-to-misappropriation-of-funds/): Prior Sanction under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is required only where the alleged offence is relatable to any recommendation made or any decision taken, by the public servant in discharge of official functions or duties and in all other cases, prior approval is not required, observed Kerala High court in Mini M\. v\. State of Kerala and Another \[2026:KER:36757\]\.

## Categories
- [Code of Criminal Procedures \(CrPC\)](https://lawwatch.in/category/criminal-law/)
- [Civil Cases \& Proceedures](https://lawwatch.in/category/civil-law/)
- [Family, Marriage \& Divorce](https://lawwatch.in/category/family-marriage-and-divorce/)
- [Property \& Succession](https://lawwatch.in/category/property-succession/)
- [Constitutional law](https://lawwatch.in/category/constitutional-law/)

## Tags
- [Evidence](https://lawwatch.in/tag/evidence/)
- [Privacy](https://lawwatch.in/tag/privacy/)

## Optional
- [Sitemap index](https://lawwatch.in/sitemap_index.xml)