In Malleeswari v. K Suguna & Another [2025 INSC 1080], the Supreme Court summed up the limited grounds for Review of a judgment permissible under Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) and they are as follows:
- The ground of discovery of new and important matter or evidence is a ground available if it is demonstrated that, despite the exercise of due diligence, this evidence was not within their knowledge or could not be produced by the party at the time, the original decree or order was passed.
- Mistake or error apparent on the face of the record may be invoked if there is something more than a mere error, and it must be the one which is manifest on the face of the record. Such an error is a patent error and not a mere wrong decision. An error which has to be established by a long-drawn process of reasoning on points where there may conceivably be two opinions can hardly be said to be an error apparent on the face of the record.
- Lastly, the phrase ‘for any other sufficient reason’ means a reason that is sufficient on grounds at least analogous to those specified in the other two categories.
An error which requires long drawn process of reasoning where two opinions are possible cannot be error apparent on the face of the record.
