Lawwatch : Legal Resources for Aspiring Advocates -

A Vacation Notice issued after Confirmation Order for Demolition Building Cannot be Challenged

By K Rajasekharan 10 February 2026Local Government LawsNo Comments

In Sathi Kumari v. The Secretary, Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram and Ors. [2024: KER:47545], the High Court of Kerala clarified that a 'Vacation Notice' issued after a Confirmation Order under Section 406 (3) of the Kerala Municipality Act, 1994 (KMA), cannot be challenged under Section 509(6) of the KMA.

False Promise of Marriage Deserves Prosecution for Rape but Consensual Relation That Fails Cannot be Criminalised

By K Rajasekharan 10 February 2026Crimes Against WomenNo Comments

In Pramod Kumar Navratna v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others [2026 INSC 124], the Supreme Court cautioned against the growing trend of criminalizing failed consensual relationships. The Court emphasized that…

When a Photocopy Can Be Admitted as Evidence: The Supreme Court’s Latest View

By K Rajasekharan 10 February 2026Indian Evidence Act, UncategorizedNo Comments

In the recent judgment of Tharammel Peethambaran v. T. Ushakrishnan [2026 INSC 134], the Supreme Court clarified that a photocopy of a document—being "secondary evidence"—is generally not admissible unless it meets the strict conditions laid out under the law.

Civil Courts Have No Jurisdiction in Violation of Building Rules but They Are Not Barred on Other Issues: Kerala HC

By K Rajasekharan 9 February 2026Local Government LawsNo Comments

In Shibu and Ors. vs. Sreekumaran and Ors. [MANU/KE/2644/2022, the High Court of Kerala examined whether the civil court had jurisdiction over a suit for a mandatory injunction to demolish a building allegedly constructed in violation of municipal rules and obstructing natural light and air.

Maintenance Proceedings Under S.125 CrPC Are Civil in Nature

By K Rajasekharan 9 February 2026Matrimonial and Maintenance CasesNo Comments

The Supreme Court, in Rina Kumari @ Rina Devi @ Reena vs. Dinesh Kumar Mahto @ Dinesh Kumar Mahato and Anr [2025 INSC 55], clarified that proceedings under Section 125 of the CrPC are essentially civil in nature.

Enforcement of Maintenance Orders under Section 125(3) CrPC / 144 BNSS

By K Rajasekharan 8 February 2026Matrimonial and Maintenance CasesNo Comments

When a person fails to comply with a maintenance decree, Section 125(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) provides the Magistrate with specific powers to enforce the payment. These powers include the attachment of property and, as a last resort, the imprisonment of the defaulter.

False Promise of Marriage under Section 69 of the BNS

By K Rajasekharan 6 February 2026Crimes Against WomenNo Comments

The Supreme Court observed in Pramod Kumar Navratna v. State of Chhattisgarh [2026 INSC 124] that the mere fact that the parties indulged in physical relations pursuant to a promise to marry will not amount to a rape in every case.

A Break Up in Relationship Cannot Result in Criminal Charges of Rape: Supreme Court

By K Rajasekharan 6 February 2026Crimes Against WomenNo Comments

In the case of Prashant v. State of NCT of Delhi [2024 INSC 879], the Supreme Court observed that the mere breakdown of a relationship between a consenting couple cannot lead to the initiation of criminal proceedings for rape.

Procedure for the Demolition of Unauthorized Buildings under the Kerala Municipality Act

By K Rajasekharan 6 February 2026Local Government Laws2 Comments

In the case of Kumari Mohanam K.P. v. Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram & Others [MANU/KE/4276/2019], the High Court of Kerala clarified the mandatory steps that municipal authorities must follow before demolishing a structure.

Consensual Sex with a Married Woman Does Not Constitute Rape Under False Promise of Marriage

By K Rajasekharan 6 February 2026Crimes Against WomenNo Comments

The High Court of Kerala in its judgement in the case XXX v State of Kerala and Another (2022 (1) KLD 780) said that a married woman, who clearly knows that the person who had sex with him cannot legally marry her when her marriage with another person subsists, cannot accuse the person on the charge of rape for giving false promise to marry.