Custodial Interrogation not required is no Ground to allow Bail

Even if custodial interrogation is not required by the prosecution, then that would not be a sound reason to grant anticipatory bail. The need for custodial interrogation is a relevant aspect to be considered in anticipatory bail petitions. But that is not the only ground that the courts need to consider while deciding any application for anticipatory bail. In many cases, custodial interrogation of the accused may not be required at all. But that does not mean that the accused might be granted anticipatory bail.

Cancellation of Bail & Its Legalities

he object of pre-trial detention of the accused is not to impose punishment but to subject him to the penal procedures of law. The “bail is not to be withheld as a punishment, but that the requirements as to bail are merely to secure the attendance of the prisoner at trial". Therefore, granting of bail should be the rule and cancellation of bail should be resorted to only in rarest of the rare cases where the accused on bail has done something wholly wrong against the sanctity of legal provisions of bail.

Bail and the law relating to it

Bail is the rule but not its refusal Bail is the rule and refusal of bail is the exception. When the bail is refused the personal liberty of the citizen is deprived. Such deprivation can be done only by following the principles and procedures known to law. That means refusal of bail must be done by following due process of law. Bail can be granted at any stage of the trial.

Anticipatory Bail & its Legalities

Factors to be considered while granting anticipatory bail The court must take the following broad factors into consideration before allowing or rejecting an application for anticipatory bail. The nature and gravity of the accusation The antecedents of the applicant such as his previous conviction or imprisonment. The probability of applicant fleeing from trial or other proceedings Whether the accusation is for injuring or humiliating the applicant