Uncategorized

The excess payment of emoluments or allowances made to an employee based on a then-interpretation of a service rule is not recoverable when it was subsequently found to be an erroneous one, the Supreme Court (SC) says in its judgement in Thomas Daniel v State of Kerala.

The past service of government employees in statutory corporations, autonomous bodies and government companies cannot be treated as qualifying service for the purpose of Pension and Death cum Retirement Gratuity (DCRG)

An employee who made a false declaration and/or suppressed the material fact of his involvement in a criminal case shall not be entitled to an appointment or to continue in service as a matter of right, says the Supreme Court.