February 2025 - Lawwatch : Legal Resources for Learners

No Deemed Sanction u/s 197 CrPC but it is there under BNSS

By K Rajasekharan 27 February 2025Criminal lawNo Comments

BNSS has the concept of deemed sanction The Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), unlike the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), provides for the concept of deemed sanction for prosecuting a public servant.

SC Summarises the Law relating to Child witnesses

By K Rajasekharan 24 February 2025Evidence lawNo Comments

The Supreme Court (SC), in The State of Madhya Pradesh v Balveer Singh [2025 INSC 261], says that the testimony of a seven-year-old child witness cannot be dismissed outright because, under Section 118 of the Evidence Act, and a child is competent to testify if they can understand the questions and provide rational answers.

Attachment of Property under BUDS Act

By K Rajasekharan 16 February 2025Civil law

The delay in filing application for confirmation of the provisional attachment of property by the Competent Authority, under Section 14(1) of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes (BUDS) Act, 2019 (BUDS Act), to the Designated Court cannot be condoned, as Section 5 of the Limitation Act is not applicable to the Section, says the High Court of Kerala, in paragraph 19 in the judgement in Highrich Online Shoppe Private Limited v The Competent Authority.

If Reason for Arrest not Informed Court must Grant Bail

By K Rajasekharan 13 February 2025Criminal law

Informing an arrested person clearly and effectively of the grounds for his/her arrest is a fundamental right under Article 22(1) of the Constitution and the right to live with dignity is a part of the rights guaranteed under Article 21, says the Supreme Court (SC) in Vihaan Kumar v The State of Haryana & Another [2025 INSC 162].

Principles to Prove Execution & Validity of a Will: SC

By K Rajasekharan 12 February 2025Property & Succession

The Supreme Court (SC) has laid down following requirements for the execution of a valid Will, under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (ISA), in Meena Pradhan & Others v Kamala Pradhan & Another [2023INSC847].

Indigence is the Sole Criteria for Compassionate Appointment

By K Rajasekharan 12 February 2025Constitutional law

The Supreme Court (SC), in Canara Bank v Ajithkumar G K [2025 INSC 184], says indigence of the dependants of the deceased employee is the fundamental condition to be satisfied under any scheme for appointment on compassionate ground.

SC will Decide Whether the Court can Modify the Arbitral Award u/s 34 of the A C Act

By K Rajasekharan 11 February 2025Civil law

The issue whether the Principal District Courts can modify arbitral awards under Section 34 and Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (A C Act) has led to conflicting decision of the Supreme Court.

If the Appellant Accused dies the Imprisonment Abates but the Fine Survives

By K Rajasekharan 8 February 2025Criminal law

The Supreme Court (SC), in Ramesh (deceased) v The State of Kerala, says if the accused-appellant dies during the pendency of a criminal appeal against a composite sentence of imprisonment and fine, the appeal does not abate. The Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) deals with abatement of appeals.

In Service Matters, Approach Administrative Tribunal first but not HC

By K Rajasekharan 8 February 2025Constitutional law

The service matters concerning recruitment and service conditions of state employees, including suspension review, fall within exclusive jurisdiction of administrative tribunal, which must be approached first before directly seeking high courts intervention in such matters, says the High Court of Kerala in Sadiq M M v State of Kerala [2025:KER:251].

Party to a Case must Disclose the Relevancy of Evidence to the Court before Summoning a Witness

By K Rajasekharan 7 February 2025Civil law

Before summoning a witnesses to court in an ongoing civil suit, the party to the case has to disclose the relevancy of that particular piece of evidence with regard to the issues arising in the suit, says the Kerala High Court in Infant Jesus Church v Southern Law Chambers, [2024 KER 87181].

Comparing Signatures based on Photocopy is Sloppy

By K Rajasekharan 5 February 2025Evidence law

Comparing signatures based on photocopy, in the absence of an original document, is a “slippery slope” and should be done with great care and circumspection, says the Kerala High Court in M G Sreejith v M/s MSS Hospital & Nursing College Pvt Ltd & Another [2025:KER:5968].

Solatium & Interest Applicable to 1997 to 2015 NH Acquisition

By K Rajasekharan 5 February 2025Criminal law

The Supreme Court (SC), in Union of India & Another v Tarsem Singh & Others has declared Section 3J of the National Highways Act 1956, to the extent it excludes solatium and interest as per Land Acquisition Act 1894 to acquisitions done under the National Highways Act (NH Act), to be unconstitutional.