Cognizance Of offence under Drugs & Cosmetics Act 1940 can't be taken based on Police Officer's complaint, says the Supreme Court (SC) in Rakesh Kumar v State of Bihar & Another.
Minor quarrels between spouses due to differences of opinion or sporadic instances of ill-treatment would not establish an offence of cruelty under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), says the High Court of Kerala in Sreekumar s/o Chellappan Chettiyar v State of Kerala [2024 (1) KLT 382] delivered on 4th January 2024.
Five options available to a competent Judicial Magistrate on receipt of a written complaint, as elaborated in Biju Purushothaman v State of Kerala & Others, and reaffirmed in Manimekhala S v State of Kerala, are outlined in this write-up.
A prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PCA) need not be initiated In all cases of malfeasance or misfeasance, or wrong administration, or in all cases of loss caused to the government while discharging duty by public servants, says the High court of Kerala in Manimekhala S v State of Kerala.
The Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB) of Kerala State, has authority to investigate offences involving corruption that take place within the State, committed by a Central Government employee or a State Government employee, says the High Court of Kerala (HCK) in State of Kerala v Navaneeth Krishnan
A complaint, under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 (DV Act), can be filed by an aggrieved woman, who has been in domestic relationship with her and the case can be against a female member of the family as well.
Returning a criminal complaint filed by the wife of an accident victim, on the sole ground that it was filed by the wife and not by the actual victim, is illegal, says the Kerala High Court (HC) in Smitha w/o Thankachan v State of Kerala.
Investigation conducted by the informant / police officer, who is the complainant, is not vitiated because of the sole reason that the informant is the investigator, says the Supreme court (SC) in Mukesh Singh v State (Narcotic Branch of Delhi) .
The names and addresses of the victim and the accused should not be printed or published in relation to the inquiry or trial of rape or any offence under Section 376, 376A, 376C, 376D or 376E of Indian Penal Code (IPC) without the previous permission of the court, says the High Court of Kerala in Saleel Raveendran v Union of India.
President gives assent to the following three criminal law bills on 25th December 2023..
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 which proposes to replace the Indian Penal Code (IPC),
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 which proposes to replace the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), and
The Bharatiya Sakshya Sanhita 2023 which seeks to replace the Indian Evidence Act.
he Section 27 the Indian Evidence Act (IEA) states that so much of information obtained from the accused when he/she is in police custody leading to the recovery of any fact alone, is admissible. The statement under this Section made to the police when the accused was not in custody or its equivalent, is also inadmissible.
The evidence act, in its Section 5, states that evidence may be given of existence or non-existence of any fact in issue and other relevant facts (declared to be relevant by the act) and of no other matter.