To claim return of gold there must be some proof In a claim for return of gold ornaments and money, the wife has to initially prove the entrustment. Mere assertions,…
The proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act) is basically civil in nature. Therefore there is no requirement for a party to be personally present as such proceedings are quasi-criminal in nature, says the SC in Vishal Shah v Monalisha Gupta & Others.
A divorced wife cannot seek permanent alimony just to attain equal wealth status with the ex-husband, says the Supreme Court (SC) in Rinku Baheti Vs Sandesh Sharda [2024 INSC 1014].
The matrimonial proceedings to seek maintenance or alimony is being used as an attempt for equalisation of wealth with the other party.
In Parvin Kumar Jain v Anju Jain [2024 INSC 961), the Supreme Court (SC) by relying on the judgements in Kiran Jyot Maini v Anish Pramod Patel and Rajnesh v Neha, outlines the factors regarding permanent alimony.
The Supreme Court (SC) cautions about the tendency to misuse provisions like Section 498-A Indian Penal Code(IPC) as a tool for unleashing personal vendetta against the husband and his family in Dara Lakshmi Narayana & Others v State of Telengana & Another [2024 INSC 953].
Husband was found guilty of criminal breach of trust under Section 406 of Indian Penal Code (IPC) for pledging his wife's gold, without her consent by the High Court of Kerala in Surendra Kumar v State of Kerala [2024: KER:76979 ].
Law cannot permit or encourage snooping by one spouse on the other. Right to privacy is a fundamental right and it includes spousal privacy. Evidence obtained by invading the fundamental right to privacy of the spouse is inadmissible in the court, says Madras High Court in the judgement in R v B.
The Supreme Court (SC) says in a judgement in Mohd. Abdul Samad v State of Telangana & Another on 10th July 2024 that the Muslim women are eligible for maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) and the religion neutral provision is applicable to all married women irrespective of their religion.
Withdrawal of an Original Petition for divorce, filed by the wife under Section 13(1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, does not automatically abate the counterclaim filed by the husband, says the High Court of Allahabad in Ishita Dua v Tarun Kumar Sharma [2024:AHC:79757-DB].
The Supreme Court (SC) in Dolly Rani v. Manish Kumar Chanchal [2024 INSC 355], state's that for a Hindu marriage to be valid in law, it must be performed with the appropriate rites and ceremonies, such as saptapadi (seven steps around the sacred fire) if included, and the proof of these ceremonies is essential in case of disputes.
Stridhan property is essentially what is gifted to a woman before marriage, at the time of marriage or at the time of bidding of farewell or thereafter and it is an “absolute property” of a woman. The husband has no control over it and it does not become a joint property of the wife and the husband. But he can use it in times of distress and he has a “moral obligation” to restore the same or its value to his wife, says the Supreme Court (SC) in Maya Gopinath v Anoop S B [2024 INSC 334].
Mutual Consent Divorce is the quickest form of divorce for an irreparably broken marriage. It is the divorce sought and obtained from the family court by consenting spouses, preferably by filing a joint petition.
Divorce is normally sought only when the husband and wife do not want to live together in a matrimonial relation any longer.