Board of Directors is the Competent Authority to Sanction Prosecution of Cooperative Bank Employees

Posted inPrevention of Corruption Act, Sanction to Prosecute Govt Servant
In K.M. Philip v. State of Kerala, the High Court of Kerala adjudicated a key legal issue: whether the State Government is the competent authority to grant sanction for the prosecution of employees of a service cooperative bank registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969.

Criminal Court has Inherent Bar in Recalling or Reviewing its judgment

Posted inCriminal Laws & Procedures
In Vikram Bakshi & Ors. v. R.P. Khosla & Anr. [ 2025 INSC 1020], the Supreme Court held that Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) bars criminal courts from altering or reviewing their own judgments once signed. The only exception expressly provided in the statute is for the correction of a clerical or arithmetical error.

Sanction under Section 17A of Prevention of Corruption Act

Posted inPrevention of Corruption Act, Sanction to Prosecute Govt Servant
In Shankara Bhat and Ors vs. State of Kerala and Ors., the Kerala High Court held that the protection afforded by Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PCA), is exclusively confined to offenses arising from a public servant's recommendations or decisions made in the discharge of their official duties.

Need for Sanction under Section 19 of the PCA for Court-Ordered Investigation

Posted inPrevention of Corruption Act, Sanction to Prosecute Govt Servant
The government sanction, under section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA), is a prerequisite for a court in ordering an investigation under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) on a private complaint, against a public servant, the High Court of Kerala states in  C.V. Balan & Ors. v. State of Kerala & Ors.

Members of Scheduled Caste will Lose Benefit When Converting to Other Religion

Posted inConstitutional law
In C. Selvarani vs. The Special Secretary Cum District Collector and Ors., the Supreme Court of India held that a person who converts to a religion with the sole intent of claiming reservation benefits is committing a fraud on the Constitution. Religious conversions undertaken for the purpose of gaining benefits of reservation compromise the integrity of the reservation system.